Because Trump was golfing (of course) when the election was called, he had to drive through all of DC celebrating his outsting. Most have posted the picture (above) of his face as they drove in. I would also like to share with you the view of what he was seeing (below courtesy of an evan vucci/AP)
this is it… the worst text a guy has ever sent me in my entire 2 decades of life…. I surpassed the 5 stages of grief when I read it and astral projected straight to hell
These policies can help to improve the mental health of students
If the point is for the children to learn, then why wouldn’t you give them as many chances as it takes? What is the benefit of telling a child “you failed and that’s the end of it”?
Also the form of estrogen they prescribed trans women in the 90s, Premarin, looked like this.
And lest there be any remaining doubt.. remember the blue pill? The pill Neo could have taken to forget the truth, bury his troubles and go back to living a normal life, without fearing a system that wanted to destroy him? The pill that was easy, perhaps cowardly according to some, but comfortable?
Here’s Prozac.
For a trans woman in the 90s, where the choice was be safe, suppress, cope, and pretend everything is still how it was, or embrace the danger, accept the truth, realize your full potential, and transition into a world that still thinks you’re a joke and would rather have you dead…. well. The metaphor is pretty fucking clear.
Y’all
Lana came out as a woman after Speed Racer in 2008, and Lily eight years later after the release of Jupiter Ascending (2016), so if you see original home copies of the Matrix (pre-2008), they are referred to as the WachowskiBrothers on it. It was a branding thing, like the Coen Brothers. That’s how they were called, because they were still presenting as male to the industry and the industry sold them as a creative unit.
I remember after Lana came out, the boxes switched to calling them just The Wachowskis, so I imagine now it’s the Wachowski Sisters.
So, yes, they’ve always been sisters, but if you didn’t know that, it’s not your fault. It’s been a long process and I’m glad they did it on their terms in their time.
tchaikowsky donating his skull to the royal shakespeare company in the hopes of becoming yorick is the most dramatic ass dark academia shit ever and you can’t convince me otherwise
I CAN’T BELIEVE THIS IS TRUE and you will not believe it that they never used on actual productions, only rehearsals because people got creeped out and didn’t want to use it, UNTIL DAVID TENNANT IN 2008
THAT MAD MAN ACTUALLY PERFORMED WITH THE REAL SKULL!
They had to stop using cause once the audience found out that was Tchaikovsky’s fucking bones(!) they got creeped out too and didn’t want it there, BUT DAVID JUST WENT “YEAH, LET ME HOLD THIS PIANIST’S FUCKING SKULL, WHO CARES”
Tchaikovsky DONATED IT FOR THAT PURPOSE. why did this creep anyone out? and why did they cave to the audience’s weird hangups?
some people are cowards
Cowards
I’m not watching Hamlet unless there’s a real-ass skull in there
Let the man have his post-mortem stage time.
Man if you have the chance to recite Shakespeare to Tchaikovsky’s actual skull and you turn it down, I have already lost faith in your ability to embody Hamlet
Guys, guys I looked up the rest of the story and it turns out this isn’t the end of it:
After the use of Tchaikowsky’s skull was revealed in the press, this production of Hamlet moved to the West End and the RSC announced that they would no longer use Tchaikowsky’s skull (a spokesman said that it would be “too distracting for the audience”).[10] However, this was a deception; in fact, the skull was used throughout the production’s West End run, and in a subsequent television adaptation broadcast on BBC2.[11] Director Gregory Doran said, “André Tchaikowsky’s skull was a very important part of our production of Hamlet, and despite all the hype about him, he meant a great deal to the company.”[11]
They told everyone they stopped and then QUIETLY KEPT USING IT because OF COURSE they did.
Anyway, my interpretation of the ending of Little women (2019) is that Jo doesn’t actually marry the professor. It’s clearly offset with the scene of the publisher insisting the main character be married and it seems to be tacked on and rushed. Jo offered up the scene as a random romantic ending to please the publisher and he accepted it. It is pure invention.
The ending where all three sisters are together with their husbands is fictionalized for the neat and tidy wrap up of the book, as shown by the bright and colorful cinematography (which is roughly the same as the scenes of childhood). The real ‘reality’ ending is Jo standing with a copy of her book.The cinematography of this scene more closely echoes the duller ‘present day’ coloring. She is alone (though she may not always be) and has finally processed and released her childhood through her book. Its a happy ending but not ‘neat and tidy’. Jo may yet struggle with loneliness, but she is young and we are free to imagine whatever ending we want for her.
